I've tried a few paths for PHP binaries on OS X, none of them seem to work. Visual Studio is finding PHP 5.6 somewhere on my computer and it's sticking to it, regardless of my settings.The error I get is 'The language server needs at least PHP 7 installed. Version found: 5.6.30'.Here are the different paths I've tried to give it: 'php.validate.executablePath': '/Applications/MAMP/bin/php/php7.1.1/bin/php','php.validate.executablePath': '/Applications/MAMP/bin/php/php7.1.1/bin/','php.validate.executablePath': '/usr/local/Cellar/php71/7.1.011/bin/','php.validate.executablePath': '/usr/local/Cellar/php71/7.1.011/bin/php',Atom uses MAMP's php binary just fine. Visual Studio Code ain't having it.
![]()
Even if a certificate is well-formed, signed, and follows the chain of trust, it may simply be a valid certificate for a different site than the site that the software is interacting with. If the certificate's host-specific data is not properly checked - such as the Common Name (CN) in the Subject or the Subject Alternative Name (SAN) extension of an X.509 certificate - it may be possible for a redirection or spoofing attack to allow a malicious host with a valid certificate to provide data, impersonating a trusted host. In order to ensure data integrity, the certificate must be valid and it must pertain to the site that is being accessed.Even if the software attempts to check the hostname, it is still possible to incorrectly check the hostname. For example, attackers could create a certificate with a name that begins with a trusted name followed by a NUL byte, which could cause some string-based comparisons to only examine the portion that contains the trusted name.This weakness can occur even when the software uses Certificate Pinning, if the software does not verify the hostname at the time a certificate is pinned. NatureTypeIDNameChildOfBase - a weaknessthat is still mostly independent of a resource or technology, but with sufficient details to provide specific methods for detection and prevention. Base level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 2 or 3 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.295ChildOfClass - a weakness that is described in a very abstract fashion, typically independent of any specific language or technology. More specific than a Pillar Weakness, but more general than a Base Weakness.
Dec 10, 2014 VALIDATEHOSTHW ERROR: vendor VIB for HP found, but host is VMware, Inc. But when I manually mount the same ESXi 5.5 ISO I had extracted in 192.168.1.155buildESXi55, to a VM I manually built I can install a nested ESXi 5.5 host. The validation process needs to continue on to the next step. The indicated device requires re-initialization due to hardware errors. The remote system is not available. For information about network troubleshooting, see Windows Help.
![]()
Class level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 1 or 2 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, and resource.923PeerOfVariant - a weaknessthat is linked to a certain type of product, typically involving a specific language or technology. More specific than a Base weakness. Variant level weaknesses typically describe issues in terms of 3 to 5 of the following dimensions: behavior, property, technology, language, and resource.370. The different Modes of Introduction provide information about how and when this weakness may be introduced.
The Phase identifies a point in the life cycle at which introduction may occur, while the Note provides a typical scenario related to introduction during the given phase. PhaseNoteArchitecture and DesignREALIZATION: This weakness is caused during implementation of an architectural security tactic.ImplementationWhen the software uses certificate pinning, the developer might not properly validate all relevant components of the certificate before pinning the certificate. This can make it difficult or expensive to test after the pinning is complete.
The table below specifies different individual consequences associated with the weakness. The Scope identifies the application security area that is violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an adversary succeeds in exploiting this weakness. The Likelihood provides information about how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other consequences in the list. For example, there may be high likelihood that a weakness will be exploited to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to achieve a different impact. ScopeImpactLikelihoodAccess Control.
![]() Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |